Title |
Paroxysmal AF Catheter Ablation With a Contact Force Sensing Catheter Results of the Prospective, Multicenter SMART-AF Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.072 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea Natale, Vivek Y. Reddy, George Monir, David J. Wilber, Bruce D. Lindsay, H. Thomas McElderry, Charan Kantipudi, Moussa C. Mansour, Daniel P. Melby, Douglas L. Packer, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Baohui Zhang, Robert B. Stagg, Lee Ming Boo, Francis E. Marchlinski |
Abstract |
Catheter ablation is important for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Limited animal and human studies suggest a correlation between electrode-tissue contact and radiofrequency lesion generation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 219 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 41 | 18% |
Other | 33 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
Student > Master | 14 | 6% |
Other | 38 | 17% |
Unknown | 58 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 53% |
Engineering | 16 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 5% |
Unknown | 68 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 343. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#95,462
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#216
of 16,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#759
of 240,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#5
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.