RT @BSCCardiology: A meta-analysis of 5 independent studies compares complication & shock rates in the S-ICD vs TV-ICDs—see the results htt…
A meta-analysis of 5 independent studies compares complication & shock rates in the S-ICD vs TV-ICDs—see the results https://t.co/eplQ1AEXdR https://t.co/R7PwNNwZte
RT @WeAreSCAUK: Study shows S-ICD's as good as ICD's with fewer lead complications https://t.co/Kucae3WT77
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: An independent meta-analysis of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD versus TV-ICDs https://t.co/QGsyBd…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
RT @WeAreSCAUK: Study shows S-ICD's as good as ICD's with fewer lead complications https://t.co/Kucae3WT77
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
Study shows S-ICD's as good as ICD's with fewer lead complications https://t.co/Kucae3WT77
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/Ueikm…
NEW DATA: The largest study (> 6,400 pts.) of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD vs. TV-ICDs https://t.co/UeikmCllhs https://t.co/AdZFt7CXNc
RT @BSCCardiology: Subcutaneous vs. Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies @JACCJournals: htt…
RT @BSCCardiology: Subcutaneous vs. Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies @JACCJournals: htt…
RT @BSCCardiology: Subcutaneous vs. Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies @JACCJournals: htt…
RT @BSCCardiology: Subcutaneous vs. Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies @JACCJournals: htt…
RT @BSCCardiology: Subcutaneous vs. Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies @JACCJournals: htt…
RT @BSCCardiology: Subcutaneous vs. Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies @JACCJournals: htt…
Subcutaneous vs. Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies @JACCJournals: https://t.co/CH884QEzGY https://t.co/iiCkNOw47R
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: An independent meta-analysis of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD versus TV-ICDs https://t.co/QGsyBd…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: An independent meta-analysis of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD versus TV-ICDs https://t.co/QGsyBd…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: An independent meta-analysis of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD versus TV-ICDs https://t.co/QGsyBd…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: An independent meta-analysis of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD versus TV-ICDs https://t.co/QGsyBd…
RT @BSCCardiology: NEW DATA: An independent meta-analysis of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD versus TV-ICDs https://t.co/QGsyBd…
NEW DATA: An independent meta-analysis of clinical outcomes associated with the S-ICD versus TV-ICDs https://t.co/QGsyBdDTOT https://t.co/zAXUi2eYFN
RT @BSCCardiology: See what the first meta-analysis (> 6,400 pts.) shows about complication & IAS rates in the S-ICD vs TV-ICDs https://t.c…
RT @BSCCardiology: See what the first meta-analysis (> 6,400 pts.) shows about complication & IAS rates in the S-ICD vs TV-ICDs https://t.c…
RT @BSCCardiology: See what the first meta-analysis (> 6,400 pts.) shows about complication & IAS rates in the S-ICD vs TV-ICDs https://t.c…
RT @BSCCardiology: See what the first meta-analysis (> 6,400 pts.) shows about complication & IAS rates in the S-ICD vs TV-ICDs https://t.c…
RT @BSCCardiology: See what the first meta-analysis (> 6,400 pts.) shows about complication & IAS rates in the S-ICD vs TV-ICDs https://t.c…
RT @BSCCardiology: See what the first meta-analysis (> 6,400 pts.) shows about complication & IAS rates in the S-ICD vs TV-ICDs https://t.c…
RT @BSCCardiology: See what the first meta-analysis (> 6,400 pts.) shows about complication & IAS rates in the S-ICD vs TV-ICDs https://t.c…
See what the first meta-analysis (> 6,400 pts.) shows about complication & IAS rates in the S-ICD vs TV-ICDs https://t.co/jbaUk0eyFc https://t.co/ij7mZVzhiT
Our first and the largest meta-analysis in JACC EP on SICD and TV-ICD. https://t.co/8ePNULmnnX