↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Contemporary Arterial Access in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 4,085)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
260 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Contemporary Arterial Access in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
Published in
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yader Sandoval, M. Nicholas Burke, Angie S. Lobo, Daniel L. Lips, Arnold H. Seto, Ivan Chavez, Paul Sorajja, Mazen S. Abu-Fadel, Yale Wang, Anil Poulouse, Mario Gössl, Michael Mooney, Jay Traverse, David Tierney, Emmanouil S. Brilakis

Abstract

Obtaining femoral and radial arterial access in the cardiac catheterization laboratory using state-of-the-art techniques is essential to optimize outcomes, patient satisfaction, and procedural efficiency. Although transradial access is increasingly used for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, femoral access remains necessary for numerous procedures, many requiring large-bore access, including complex high-risk coronary interventions, structural procedures, and procedures involving mechanical circulatory support. For femoral access, contemporary access techniques should combine the use of fluoroscopy, ultrasound, micropuncture needle, femoral angiography, and vascular closure devices, when feasible. For radial access, ultrasound may reveal important anatomic features and expedite access. Despite randomized controlled trials supporting use of routine ultrasound guidance for femoral and/or radial arterial access, ultrasound remains underused in cardiac catheterization laboratories. This article reviews contemporary techniques to achieve optimal arterial access in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 260 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 20 17%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 36 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 47 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#245,025
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#19
of 4,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,051
of 341,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#1
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.