| Title |
2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Bleeding in Patients on Oral Anticoagulants A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gordon F. Tomaselli, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Adam Cuker, Paul P. Dobesh, John U. Doherty, John W. Eikelboom, Roberta Florido, William Hucker, Roxana Mehran, Steven R. Messé, Charles V. Pollack, Fatima Rodriguez, Ravindra Sarode, Deborah Siegal, Barbara S. Wiggins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 497 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 119 | 24% |
| United States | 67 | 13% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 14 | 3% |
| Mexico | 14 | 3% |
| Colombia | 13 | 3% |
| Canada | 13 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 2% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 38 | 8% |
| Unknown | 199 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 365 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 82 | 16% |
| Scientists | 34 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 312 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 66 | 21% |
| Researcher | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 67 | 21% |
| Unknown | 74 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 49% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 35 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Unknown | 84 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 370. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#87,578
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#200
of 17,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,957
of 448,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#7
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.