Title |
The Myth of the “Vulnerable Plaque” Transitioning From a Focus on Individual Lesions to Atherosclerotic Disease Burden for Coronary Artery Disease Risk Assessment
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.041 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Armin Arbab-Zadeh, Valentin Fuster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 24% |
India | 2 | 6% |
Argentina | 2 | 6% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
Scientists | 5 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 252 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 17% |
Researcher | 40 | 16% |
Student > Master | 24 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
Other | 21 | 8% |
Other | 57 | 22% |
Unknown | 50 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 47% |
Engineering | 21 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 6% |
Chemistry | 7 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 8% |
Unknown | 67 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,403,979
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#3,318
of 16,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,678
of 362,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#34
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.