RT @cshenoy3: MAGnet Trial – RCT of stress CMR vs. coronary angiography as the initial strategy. Stress CMR strategy "safe, reduced revascu…
RT @cshenoy3: MAGnet Trial – RCT of stress CMR vs. coronary angiography as the initial strategy. Stress CMR strategy "safe, reduced revascu…
RT @cshenoy3: MAGnet Trial – RCT of stress CMR vs. coronary angiography as the initial strategy. Stress CMR strategy "safe, reduced revascu…
RT @cshenoy3: MAGnet Trial – RCT of stress CMR vs. coronary angiography as the initial strategy. Stress CMR strategy "safe, reduced revascu…
RT @cshenoy3: MAGnet Trial – RCT of stress CMR vs. coronary angiography as the initial strategy. Stress CMR strategy "safe, reduced revascu…
RT @cshenoy3: MAGnet Trial – RCT of stress CMR vs. coronary angiography as the initial strategy. Stress CMR strategy "safe, reduced revascu…
RT @cshenoy3: MAGnet Trial – RCT of stress CMR vs. coronary angiography as the initial strategy. Stress CMR strategy "safe, reduced revascu…
RT @cshenoy3: MAGnet Trial – RCT of stress CMR vs. coronary angiography as the initial strategy. Stress CMR strategy "safe, reduced revascu…
RT @cshenoy3: MAGnet Trial – RCT of stress CMR vs. coronary angiography as the initial strategy. Stress CMR strategy "safe, reduced revascu…
MAGnet Trial – RCT of stress CMR vs. coronary angiography as the initial strategy. Stress CMR strategy "safe, reduced revascularization procedures, better quality of life at 12-months, though non-inferiority could not be proved". JACC Imaging paper - https
informative study @CardioBCN #coronaryarterydisease https://t.co/Q2kzbkRPha
RT @CardioBCN: Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Dise…
RT @CardioBCN: Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Dise…
RT @CardioBCN: Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Dise…
RT @CardioBCN: Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Dise…
Comparing CMR v angiography-guided treatment of patients with stable CAD. Safe, reduced revasc procedures and better QOL at 12 months https://t.co/TgXhrzvKSX #WhyCMR
Results from prospective RCT on #CMR adenosine stress vs cath to guide management. https://t.co/xNJJpVVVmj
RT @CardioBCN: Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Dise…
Estudio de estrés con resonancia mostró buenos resultados para el seguimiento de pacientes comparados con cinecoronariografia a corto plazo. A largo plazo muestran que a la técnica aún le falta desarrollo. https://t.co/RHhaskHMS1
RT @CardioBCN: Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Dise…
RT @CardioBCN: Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Dise…
RT @CardioBCN: Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Dise…
Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease https://t.co/3tBlLKsRVJ