| Title |
Ambulatory Inotrope Infusions in Advanced Heart Failure A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Heart Failure, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.03.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tiana Nizamic, M. Hassan Murad, Larry A. Allen, Colleen K. McIlvennan, Sara E. Wordingham, Daniel D. Matlock, Shannon M. Dunlay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 16% |
| United States | 9 | 15% |
| Colombia | 5 | 8% |
| Mexico | 5 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 5% |
| Argentina | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Croatia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 18% |
| Scientists | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,090,516
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#349
of 1,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,784
of 343,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#14
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.