@MartowMartow @andrefdavila Here is a slide from the VT Symposium in October. In experimental models of normal tissue, 90 seconds is pretty much the limit for achieving maximal depth. Note: In normal tissue on a bench top. https://t.co/xVgnaaoJWz https:/
@mustafa_omarov @Firaszahwe Wider shallower lesion based on data from @True_EP and @Zo_EP2 (link below). Likely for PW spots where you worry about esophageal heating. https://t.co/JZ1GxDVrQD
将来我们该怎么消融
High power, short duration yields similar ablation volume with less depth than low power, long duration: https://t.co/bMIrSiuE0e. #JACCCEP @True_EP @Zo_EP2 https://t.co/rip4FfE96o
Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 grams of force https://t.co/p3KonFw3mc
RT @jvillacastin: For in vivo models, 50 W/5 s ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20 W/30 s ablatio…
RT @jvillacastin: For in vivo models, 50 W/5 s ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20 W/30 s ablatio…
For in vivo models, 50 W/5 s ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20 W/30 s ablation lesions. Peak temperatures were not significantly different at 2 and 4 mm with 50 W/5 s versus 20 W/30 s. https://t.co/jlpZB9p2hS htt
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @TinaBaykaner: Nice study @True_EP and @Zo_EP2 ! Do you use 40-50W for left atrial ablation? https://t.co/DbA1kY6v9f
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @TinaBaykaner: Nice study @True_EP and @Zo_EP2 ! Do you use 40-50W for left atrial ablation? https://t.co/DbA1kY6v9f
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @TinaBaykaner: Nice study @True_EP and @Zo_EP2 ! Do you use 40-50W for left atrial ablation? https://t.co/DbA1kY6v9f
Nice study @True_EP and @Zo_EP2 ! Do you use 40-50W for left atrial ablation? https://t.co/DbA1kY6v9f
RT @paulzei: nice work guys! https://t.co/5orlffy70C
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @paulzei: nice work guys! https://t.co/5orlffy70C
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @paulzei: nice work guys! https://t.co/5orlffy70C
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @paulzei: nice work guys! https://t.co/5orlffy70C
RT @paulzei: nice work guys! https://t.co/5orlffy70C
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
Ablation lesions with different power and duration.
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @paulzei: nice work guys! https://t.co/5orlffy70C
RT @paulzei: nice work guys! https://t.co/5orlffy70C
RT @paulzei: nice work guys! https://t.co/5orlffy70C
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
Interesting findings! Thoughts?
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @paulzei: nice work guys! https://t.co/5orlffy70C
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
RT @JACCJournals: Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 g…
nice work guys!
Power or duration? 50W/5s RF ablation lesions yielded similar volumes but significantly less depth than 20W/30s with 10 grams of force #JACCCEP https://t.co/4TO2wZisvO. @True_EP @Zo_EP2 https://t.co/U3UUYuKZK6