RT @DrSheilaSahni: Part II of Clinician’s Guide for Trending Cardiovascular Nutrition Controversies is out! Answering our patients ?s on #h…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @DrSheilaSahni: Part II of Clinician’s Guide for Trending Cardiovascular Nutrition Controversies is out! Answering our patients ?s on #h…
Part II of Clinician’s Guide for Trending Cardiovascular Nutrition Controversies is out! Answering our patients ?s on #heartheath diet “hypes” & controversies @JACCJournals #nutrition #hearthealth #diet #foodfad #fitfam #healthyforgood #healthyforlife
RT @Alvaro_Gonza: Muy aclaratorio https://t.co/xrklppViAI
RT @ValleAlfonso: The evidence to date suggests adverse CV outcomes with high intake of both red meat and added sugar, excessive vitamin B1…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
A tener en cuenta. No todo lo que dicen es cierto. Hay evidencia solo para algunos nutrientes o suplementos https://t.co/yOHsdhQfXK
A Clinician’s Guide for Trending Cardiovascular Nutrition Controversies https://t.co/8DFMBrrLn9
RT @doctorheart00: Controversias en nutrición cardiovascular https://t.co/lamgpEeH3T
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
Señores de @infosalus_com OJO que el estudio habla de derivados lácteos y NO de la leche... y la foto es un vaso de leche... https://t.co/AS2WB4zC6a https://t.co/xR0Wybf8ev
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @foodnuthealth: @rosestant70 The article mentioned in this report can be found here: https://t.co/emOrdmOWCE The 1st article by these au…
Muy aclaratorio https://t.co/xrklppViAI
RT @ValleAlfonso: The evidence to date suggests adverse CV outcomes with high intake of both red meat and added sugar, excessive vitamin B1…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @foodnuthealth: @rosestant70 The article mentioned in this report can be found here: https://t.co/emOrdmOWCE The 1st article by these au…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
@rosestant70 The article mentioned in this report can be found here: https://t.co/emOrdmOWCE The 1st article by these authors appears to be this one: https://t.co/I76jflQAzt. Image below from 1st article - see article for content on cholesterol, oils &
Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/HZKoFvdw52
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
Не очень то много ... https://t.co/rBqjf0wmS1
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @DrNithi: เรื่องอาหารจริงอาหารเสริมที่เขาว่ากันบางเรื่องมีข้อมูลสนับสนุนแข็งแรง บางเรื่องยังไม่ชัดเจน ตารางนี้พอสรุปได้ครับ https://t.co…
อาหารหลักอาหารเสริมที่ว่าดี ที่ว่าร้าย เรื่องไหนมีข้อมูลสนับสนุน เรื่องไหนมั่ว(ข้อมูลปัจจุบัน) ว่าไปตามนี้ครับ https://t.co/uRK77KhWTB
เรื่องอาหารจริงอาหารเสริมที่เขาว่ากันบางเรื่องมีข้อมูลสนับสนุนแข็งแรง บางเรื่องยังไม่ชัดเจน ตารางนี้พอสรุปได้ครับ https://t.co/uRK77KhWTB
Interesting ! More evidence rated for CVD benefits for mushrooms than fermented foods... https://t.co/alv20Aj2Yf
Controversias en nutrición cardiovascular https://t.co/lamgpEeH3T
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @ValleAlfonso: The evidence to date suggests adverse CV outcomes with high intake of both red meat and added sugar, excessive vitamin B1…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @ValleAlfonso: The evidence to date suggests adverse CV outcomes with high intake of both red meat and added sugar, excessive vitamin B1…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @ValleAlfonso: The evidence to date suggests adverse CV outcomes with high intake of both red meat and added sugar, excessive vitamin B1…
A Clinician’s Guide for Trending Cardiovascular Nutrition Controversies https://t.co/OjZGmTSYg9
RT @ValleAlfonso: The evidence to date suggests adverse CV outcomes with high intake of both red meat and added sugar, excessive vitamin B1…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
No real surprises. More data to back up conclusions. Sugar - bad, energy drinks-bad. Fermented products & dairy products are neutral or jury still out. Many good choices. @Luna_DNA https://t.co/1nbK5m3Mlo
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
Where to start with this? 🤦♂️ https://t.co/Yicr6gvY9Z
RT @ValleAlfonso: The evidence to date suggests adverse CV outcomes with high intake of both red meat and added sugar, excessive vitamin B1…
RT @ValleAlfonso: The evidence to date suggests adverse CV outcomes with high intake of both red meat and added sugar, excessive vitamin B1…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
The evidence to date suggests adverse CV outcomes with high intake of both red meat and added sugar, excessive vitamin B12, and any amounts of energy drinks vía @JACCJournals https://t.co/6SDRgG9ngw https://t.co/iiGeMYndhR
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
nice, simple infographic https://t.co/Q8qoHAkX3t
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
My understanding of the nutrition evidence is exactly this: limiting added sugars is paramount. Aside from that I think @michaelpollan nailed it. Eat (real) food. Not too much. Mostly plants. Worrying beyond that is only useful for people with special diet
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/181F6Z2pjO by @heartcuredoc et al @JACCJournals #OA ? mushrooms https://t.co/wU8U3srWu7
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…
RT @EricTopol: Controversies in nutrition: an "evidence-based review" for ? cardiovascular benefit and risk https://t.co/L3LqvleutX by @hea…