↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction Is it Possible to Escape One’s Past?

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
120 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction Is it Possible to Escape One’s Past?
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.05.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaurav Gulati, James E. Udelson

Abstract

Among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, investigators have repeatedly identified a subgroup whose left ventricular ejection fraction and structural remodeling can improve to normal or nearly normal levels with or without medical therapy. This subgroup of patients with "heart failure with improved ejection fraction" has distinct clinical characteristics and a more favorable prognosis compared with patients who continue to have reduced ejection fraction. However, many of these patients also manifest clinical and biochemical signs of incomplete resolution of heart failure pathophysiology and remain at some risk of adverse outcomes, thus indicating that they may not have completely recovered. Although rigorous evidence on managing these patients is sparse, there are several reasons to recommend continuation of heart failure therapies, including device therapies, to prevent clinical deterioration. Notable exceptions to this recommendation may include patients who recover from peripartum cardiomyopathy, fulminant myocarditis, or stress cardiomyopathy, whose excellent long-term prognoses may imply true myocardial recovery. More research on these patients is needed to better understand the mechanisms that lead to improvement in ejection fraction and to guide their clinical management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#637,707
of 25,403,829 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#168
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,599
of 341,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,403,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.