| Title |
Anatomic Basis and Physiological Rationale of Distal Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary and Endovascular Procedures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.045 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory A. Sgueglia, Angela Di Giorgio, Achille Gaspardone, Avtandil Babunashvili |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 229 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 57 | 25% |
| Spain | 13 | 6% |
| India | 9 | 4% |
| Germany | 7 | 3% |
| Argentina | 7 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Turkey | 6 | 3% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 23% |
| Unknown | 61 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 152 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 14% |
| Scientists | 32 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 47% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2021.
All research outputs
#280,400
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#23
of 4,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,783
of 355,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#2
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.