No se pierdan este artículo!! que nos hace plantearnos si debemos cambiar nuestro punto de corte en estenosis aórtica con escasos ningún síntoma de 50% a 55% https://t.co/y9qHzqUQqA
RT @MAecocardio: Imperdible -Muy importante trabajo en JACC imaging!!!!! https://t.co/dCUyhnGFPv que cuestiona “milenario concepto” : Debe…
RT @PPibarot: Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fract…
RT @MAecocardio: Imperdible -Muy importante trabajo en JACC imaging!!!!! https://t.co/dCUyhnGFPv que cuestiona “milenario concepto” : Debe…
RT @MAecocardio: Imperdible -Muy importante trabajo en JACC imaging!!!!! https://t.co/dCUyhnGFPv que cuestiona “milenario concepto” : Debe…
Imperdible -Muy importante trabajo en JACC imaging!!!!! https://t.co/dCUyhnGFPv que cuestiona “milenario concepto” : Debemos cambiar punto de corte toma decisión en Estenosis aortica sin clinica o minima de 50% a otro mas elevado - 55% ? https://t.co/
RT @PPibarot: Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fract…
RT @PPibarot: Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fract…
RT @PPibarot: Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fract…
RT @PPibarot: Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fract…
RT @VictorDayan1: Modificacion del punto de corte en la FEVI para pacientes con Estenosis aortica asintomatica https://t.co/M9WL3XOCzO
RT @VictorDayan1: Modificacion del punto de corte en la FEVI para pacientes con Estenosis aortica asintomatica https://t.co/M9WL3XOCzO
RT @VictorDayan1: Modificacion del punto de corte en la FEVI para pacientes con Estenosis aortica asintomatica https://t.co/M9WL3XOCzO
Modificacion del punto de corte en la FEVI para pacientes con Estenosis aortica asintomatica
Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Mortality in Asymptomatic and Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis | JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging https://t.co/0AQarM4hft
RT @PPibarot: Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fract…
RT @PPibarot: Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fract…
RT @PPibarot: Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fract…
RT @PPibarot: Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fract…
RT @PPibarot: Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fract…
Is it time for a change of LVEF <50% cut-point? 55 or 60% may be better: Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Mortality in Asymptomatic and Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis | JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
RT @BartsEcho: When should you intervene in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis? Outcome in pts with LVEF <55% is poor. Is…
RT @guyll: This is very similar to HAVEC in https://t.co/MkHVMZh5gQ. two large cohorts suggesting that EF <55% bad news. Time for a rethink…
RT @BartsEcho: When should you intervene in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis? Outcome in pts with LVEF <55% is poor. Is…
RT @BartsEcho: When should you intervene in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis? Outcome in pts with LVEF <55% is poor. Is…
RT @BartsEcho: When should you intervene in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis? Outcome in pts with LVEF <55% is poor. Is…
RT @guyll: This is very similar to HAVEC in https://t.co/MkHVMZh5gQ. two large cohorts suggesting that EF <55% bad news. Time for a rethink…
RT @guyll: This is very similar to HAVEC in https://t.co/MkHVMZh5gQ. two large cohorts suggesting that EF <55% bad news. Time for a rethink…
RT @BartsEcho: When should you intervene in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis? Outcome in pts with LVEF <55% is poor. Is…
RT @BartsEcho: When should you intervene in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis? Outcome in pts with LVEF <55% is poor. Is…
RT @guyll: This is very similar to HAVEC in https://t.co/MkHVMZh5gQ. two large cohorts suggesting that EF <55% bad news. Time for a rethink…
RT @guyll: This is very similar to HAVEC in https://t.co/MkHVMZh5gQ. two large cohorts suggesting that EF <55% bad news. Time for a rethink…
This is very similar to HAVEC in https://t.co/MkHVMZh5gQ. two large cohorts suggesting that EF <55% bad news. Time for a rethink on watchful wait
RT @BartsEcho: When should you intervene in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis? Outcome in pts with LVEF <55% is poor. Is…
When should you intervene in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis? Outcome in pts with LVEF <55% is poor. Is this the new threshold for intervention? https://t.co/ycUPCYFB9r https://t.co/aH8fzkSlP2
Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Mortality in Asymptomatic and Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis @JACCJournals https://t.co/BTHYHAnqjY