| Title |
Proportionate and Disproportionate Functional Mitral Regurgitation A New Conceptual Framework That Reconciles the Results of the MITRA-FR and COAPT Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul A Grayburn, Anna Sannino, Milton Packer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 192 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 52 | 27% |
| Spain | 20 | 10% |
| Argentina | 8 | 4% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Colombia | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Mexico | 5 | 3% |
| Italy | 5 | 3% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 115 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 43 | 22% |
| Scientists | 24 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 296 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 18% |
| Other | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 51 | 17% |
| Unknown | 78 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 167 | 56% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Psychology | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 96 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#279,423
of 25,670,640 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#39
of 2,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,848
of 447,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#4
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,670,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.