RT @mirvatalasnag: 4.#FFRCT pro & cons: provides spectrum of ischemia rather than a binary yes/no & it is a work in progress #PACIFICTrial…
RT @mirvatalasnag: 4.#FFRCT pro & cons: provides spectrum of ischemia rather than a binary yes/no & it is a work in progress #PACIFICTrial…
RT @mirvatalasnag: 4.#FFRCT pro & cons: provides spectrum of ischemia rather than a binary yes/no & it is a work in progress #PACIFICTrial…
4.#FFRCT pro & cons: provides spectrum of ischemia rather than a binary yes/no & it is a work in progress #PACIFICTrial long term results anticipated https://t.co/biautffXry #SCCT2022 https://t.co/xvgVdnzoPa
"On an intention-to-diagnose basis, however, PET displays the highest diagnostic performance due to the relatively high rejection rate of FFRCT." https://t.co/ag47FJVlS7
🧵[7/9] 📜 Our results are consistent with prior literature on showing that #FFRCT can detect more ischemia compared to #SPECT https://t.co/OODVfbOHw1 https://t.co/4TBjo6OvGU https://t.co/Y4hGiNSDny
RT @pash22: Hi @NICEComms , as a @NHSEngland commissner, I wud appreciate some urgent clarificatn please. We have just been informed that t…
RT @pash22: Hi @NICEComms , as a @NHSEngland commissner, I wud appreciate some urgent clarificatn please. We have just been informed that t…
Hi @NICEComms , as a @NHSEngland commissner, I wud appreciate some urgent clarificatn please. We have just been informed that this tech' will save the NHS millions @DrAoifeMolloy @CatherineThomp8 @drtimwilson @janewilcock @MartinRCGP @TomPMarshall @paulpha
RT @venkmurthy: CT-FFR only did better with unblinded core lab & ignoring ~ 1 in 5 lesions/1 in 4 pts where it wasn't even evaluable. Inte…
RT @venkmurthy: CT-FFR only did better with unblinded core lab & ignoring ~ 1 in 5 lesions/1 in 4 pts where it wasn't even evaluable. Inte…
RT @venkmurthy: CT-FFR only did better with unblinded core lab & ignoring ~ 1 in 5 lesions/1 in 4 pts where it wasn't even evaluable. Inte…
CT-FFR only did better with unblinded core lab & ignoring ~ 1 in 5 lesions/1 in 4 pts where it wasn't even evaluable. Intention to diagnose is the appropriate approach and CT-FFR was worse with that approach, *even ignoring the unblinding*. https://t
@Cardioimager @AdityaMandawat @DavidLBrownMD @ejacobsmd https://t.co/AGZzUtwLim Intention-to-diagnose means you don't ignore all the cases where you don't even get a number. This *still* doesn't fix the blinding issue. https://t.co/QOtmv8xyPP
RT @JCIRC_IPR: Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosi…
RT @JCIRC_IPR: Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosi…
Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis https://t.co/4k8eZEoTIz #20JCS
RT @DavidLBrownMD: Wow. Now FFR is the gold standard against which perfusion imaging is compared. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomograph…
Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis https://t.co/xH0YQbYHMf
RT @TheBJCA: Dr. Kelion highlights the PACIFIC study. Great comparisons between assessment modalities. https://t.co/deo9kysaQG
RT @TheBJCA: Dr. Kelion highlights the PACIFIC study. Great comparisons between assessment modalities. https://t.co/deo9kysaQG
RT @TheBJCA: Dr. Kelion highlights the PACIFIC study. Great comparisons between assessment modalities. https://t.co/deo9kysaQG
RT @TheBJCA: Dr. Kelion highlights the PACIFIC study. Great comparisons between assessment modalities. https://t.co/deo9kysaQG
Dr. Kelion highlights the PACIFIC study. Great comparisons between assessment modalities. https://t.co/deo9kysaQG
@JACCJournals recently published the PACIFIC substudy, showing how the #HeartFlowAnalysis compares to other non-invasive tests. Read more: https://t.co/rl9QfBqvLC
FFR CT better than CTA and SPECT study for predicting coronary ischemia https://t.co/AK1ZalzCt1
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
ICYMI: The PACIFIC substudy was published in @JACCJournals, showing how the #HeartFlowAnalysis compares to other non-invasive tests. Read more here: https://t.co/FvKac4dnmJ
RT @taku_inohara: CT-FFRが術前検査のdefaultになる日も近そうだ https://t.co/9loUsMVo6y
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @taku_inohara: CT-FFRが術前検査のdefaultになる日も近そうだ https://t.co/9loUsMVo6y
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @AkhilGulati: ONE of the tools in the toolbox... we have had much success with this in certain patients at @BeaumontHealth and it certai…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
ONE of the tools in the toolbox... we have had much success with this in certain patients at @BeaumontHealth and it certainly adds value to a standard CTA. @ChinnaiyanMD @trivaxheartmd @HeartFlow
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @mzkhalil: Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis…
Interesting study on non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease.
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis. https://t.co/Pk0GzyZ5ra https://t.co/DDDIO4CRi6
RT @nycnymd: Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis…
Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis | JACC #FFRCT #HeartFlowAnalysis adds value to #CCTA https://t.co/Juv0a83hFD
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
@rosencher @Costa_F_8 @jyfraboulet @ErinMichos @AngoulvantD @AnastasiaSMihai @CCF_cardio @Costa_F_8 @OlivierHoffman
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @taku_inohara: CT-FFRが術前検査のdefaultになる日も近そうだ https://t.co/9loUsMVo6y
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
@moisesjimenezs @stephy2611 @JuanChinoMendo1
CT-FFRが術前検査のdefaultになる日も近そうだ
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b…
CTA-derived FFR: Is it time to add this to our routine ischemia assessments? https://t.co/W39zXziN2h #JACC https://t.co/b08GTyiukq
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
The future!
RT @JACCJournals: CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
CTA-FFR goes head-to-head with PET, SPECT and cCTA. How did it do? https://t.co/UF3NfdfIQt #JACC https://t.co/9rWMF3dpAm
RT @ghoshhajra: 75% of the time I'm 78% accurate...or something. Good twitter discussion on this paper. https://t.co/AFHvVSeXEc
RT @ghoshhajra: 75% of the time I'm 78% accurate...or something. Good twitter discussion on this paper. https://t.co/AFHvVSeXEc