| Title |
Blood Pressure Assessment in Adults in Clinical Practice and Clinic-Based Research JACC Scientific Expert Panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.069 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Muntner, Paula T. Einhorn, William C. Cushman, Paul K. Whelton, Natalie A. Bello, Paul E. Drawz, Beverly B. Green, Daniel W. Jones, Stephen P. Juraschek, Karen L. Margolis, Edgar R. Miller, Ann Marie Navar, Yechiam Ostchega, Michael K. Rakotz, Bernard Rosner, Joseph E. Schwartz, Daichi Shimbo, George S. Stergiou, Raymond R. Townsend, Jeff D. Williamson, Jackson T. Wright, Lawrence J. Appel, Lung 2017 National Heart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 18% |
| Spain | 11 | 9% |
| Mexico | 7 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 5% |
| Colombia | 5 | 4% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 91 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 13% |
| Scientists | 11 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 24% |
| Unknown | 61 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 71 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#457,547
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,107
of 16,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,096
of 449,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#29
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.