Title |
Neutrophil Subsets, Platelets, and Vascular Disease in Psoriasis
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Basic to Translational Science, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.10.008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heather L. Teague, Nevin J. Varghese, Lam C. Tsoi, Amit K. Dey, Michael S. Garshick, Joanna I. Silverman, Yvonne Baumer, Charlotte L. Harrington, Erin Stempinski, Youssef A. Elnabawi, Pradeep K. Dagur, Kairong Cui, Ilker Tunc, Fayaz Seifuddin, Aditya A. Joshi, Elena Stansky, Monica M. Purmalek, Justin A. Rodante, Andrew Keel, Tarek Z. Aridi, Carmelo Carmona-Rivera, Gregory E. Sanda, Marcus Y. Chen, Mehdi Pirooznia, J. Philip McCoy, Joel M. Gelfand, Keji Zhao, Johann E. Gudjonsson, Martin P. Playford, Mariana J. Kaplan, Jeffrey S. Berger, Nehal N. Mehta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 34 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 25% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 10% |
Engineering | 5 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 36 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,879,916
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#439
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,409
of 367,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.