| Title |
Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes Institutional Costs and Physician Burden
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rishi K Wadhera, Colin W O'Brien, Karen E Joynt Maddox, Kalon K L Ho, Duane S Pinto, Frederic S Resnic, Pinak B Shah, Robert W Yeh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 70% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 49% |
| Scientists | 18 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,033,061
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,542
of 16,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,695
of 367,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#98
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.