↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
339 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock
Published in
JACC, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Behnam N. Tehrani, Alexander G. Truesdell, Matthew W. Sherwood, Shashank Desai, Henry A. Tran, Kelly C. Epps, Ramesh Singh, Mitchell Psotka, Palak Shah, Lauren B. Cooper, Carolyn Rosner, Anika Raja, Scott D. Barnett, Patricia Saulino, Christopher R. deFilippi, Paul A. Gurbel, Charles E. Murphy, Christopher M. O’Connor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 282 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 297 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 36 12%
Researcher 34 11%
Student > Postgraduate 28 9%
Student > Master 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 65 22%
Unknown 94 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 116 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#150,893
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#334
of 16,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,067
of 365,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#12
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.