| Title |
Intensive Care Utilization in Stable Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Rapid Reperfusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.230 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jay S. Shavadia, Anita Y. Chen, Alexander C. Fanaroff, James A. de Lemos, Michael C. Kontos, Tracy Y. Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 21 | 23% |
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Mexico | 5 | 5% |
| Belgium | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Romania | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 20% |
| Scientists | 11 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2019.
All research outputs
#625,643
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#139
of 4,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,231
of 364,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#4
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.