↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Cardiac Radiation Dose, Cardiac Disease, and Mortality in Patients With Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Cardiac Radiation Dose, Cardiac Disease, and Mortality in Patients With Lung Cancer
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), June 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.500
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katelyn M. Atkins, Bhupendra Rawal, Tafadzwa L. Chaunzwa, Nayan Lamba, Danielle S. Bitterman, Christopher L. Williams, David E. Kozono, Elizabeth H. Baldini, Aileen B. Chen, Paul L. Nguyen, Anthony V. D’Amico, Anju Nohria, Udo Hoffmann, Hugo J.W.L. Aerts, Raymond H. Mak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 214. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#58,324
of 13,232,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#171
of 11,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,630
of 217,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#9
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,232,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.