| Title |
Hemodynamic Effects of Weight Loss in Obesity A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Heart Failure, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yogesh N V Reddy, Mahesh Anantha-Narayanan, Masaru Obokata, Katlyn E Koepp, Patricia Erwin, Rickey E Carter, Barry A Borlaug |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 21% |
| United States | 9 | 19% |
| Australia | 4 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 21% |
| Scientists | 7 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,124,763
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#355
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,206
of 360,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.