↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Vertebral Artery Stenting in a Patient With Bow Hunter’s Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Case Reports, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
232 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Vertebral Artery Stenting in a Patient With Bow Hunter’s Syndrome
Published in
JACC: Case Reports, June 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.05.010
Authors

Niya Boykova Mileva, Dobrin Iotkov Vassilev, Ivanichka Serbezova, Gianluca Rigatelli, Robert J. Gill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 232 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#88,129
of 13,396,402 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Case Reports
#1
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,541
of 218,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Case Reports
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,396,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.