@leftbundle @drjohnm To some extent, the trial has already been done: https://t.co/kbOiQae40F
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @PrashSanders: This is important data while we await RCT #JACCCEP @JACCJournals https://t.co/BIVoufetTd
RT @PrashSanders: This is important data while we await RCT #JACCCEP @JACCJournals https://t.co/BIVoufetTd
RT @PrashSanders: This is important data while we await RCT #JACCCEP @JACCJournals https://t.co/BIVoufetTd
RT @PrashSanders: This is important data while we await RCT #JACCCEP @JACCJournals https://t.co/BIVoufetTd
RT @PrashSanders: This is important data while we await RCT #JACCCEP @JACCJournals https://t.co/BIVoufetTd
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
AF recurrence was significantly lower with an ablation including PVI than an ablation without PVI (RR: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33 to 0.89; p = 0.0147; I2 = 79.7%).
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @PrashSanders: This is important data while we await RCT #JACCCEP @JACCJournals https://t.co/BIVoufetTd
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
This is important data while we await RCT #JACCCEP @JACCJournals
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
RT @JACCJournals: This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #A…
This #JACCCEP meta-analysis of RCTs comparing ablations w/ PVI vs ablations w/o PVI provides evidence that PVI reduces #AFib recurrence. No sham-controlled trial (yet?) but no "subtraction anxiety" either: https://t.co/wb13p0MsUW https://t.co/FiB0QVEVPS
RT @DrAfzalSohaib: @MelbourneEPdoc @drjohnm @venkmurthy @VPrasadMDMPH @MKIttlesonMD @ProfDFrancis Done already. Well, sort of. PVI effecti…
@MelbourneEPdoc @drjohnm @venkmurthy @VPrasadMDMPH @MKIttlesonMD @ProfDFrancis Done already. Well, sort of. PVI effective ++ compared to other non-PVI ablation targets at reducing AF burden. Are those non-PVI targets a bit like sham? https://t.co/KWBlWB
Many thanks @drraviele. Full link to article👇 https://t.co/KWBlWBfKGh
@RoTi24877728 @jorn_schmitt @ChristianHeeger @Phiso_de @LuigiDiBiaseMD @andreanatalemd @GerdHindricks @IngoEitel @FraSantoroMD @DavidDuncker @Prof_Schilling Studies of AF ablation without PVI versus with PVI are the nearest we have to sham controls. To da
RT @DrAfzalSohaib: @drjohnm @LuigiDiBiaseMD This is the closest evidence we have to sham control for AF (but still some way off) https://…
@drjohnm @LuigiDiBiaseMD This is the closest evidence we have to sham control for AF (but still some way off) https://t.co/KWBlWBfKGh
RT @DrAhranArnold: The necessity of a sham controlled RCT of PVI for AF remains contested but in the meantime we have this meta-analysis fr…
RT @DrJHoward: Does PVI work? There haven’t been any blinded RCTs versus sham, but we can analyse trials where both arms received ablation…
@aalahmadmd Our meta-analysis might give a clue to how it might look. PVI certainly good at reducing AF burden compared to alternative invasive procedures https://t.co/KWBlWBfKGh
RT @DrJHoward: Does PVI work? There haven’t been any blinded RCTs versus sham, but we can analyse trials where both arms received ablation…
RT @DrAfzalSohaib: PVI verses non-PVI ablation for AF. The nearest thing we have to sham controls. Unanswered questions remain but PVI cert…
RT @DrAfzalSohaib: PVI verses non-PVI ablation for AF. The nearest thing we have to sham controls. Unanswered questions remain but PVI cert…
RT @DrJHoward: Does PVI work? There haven’t been any blinded RCTs versus sham, but we can analyse trials where both arms received ablation…
RT @DrJHoward: Does PVI work? There haven’t been any blinded RCTs versus sham, but we can analyse trials where both arms received ablation…
RT @DrAhranArnold: The necessity of a sham controlled RCT of PVI for AF remains contested but in the meantime we have this meta-analysis fr…
RT @DrJHoward: Does PVI work? There haven’t been any blinded RCTs versus sham, but we can analyse trials where both arms received ablation…
RT @DrAfzalSohaib: PVI verses non-PVI ablation for AF. The nearest thing we have to sham controls. Unanswered questions remain but PVI cert…
@ihtanboga what do you think about design?
RT @DrAhranArnold: The necessity of a sham controlled RCT of PVI for AF remains contested but in the meantime we have this meta-analysis fr…
RT @DrAfzalSohaib: PVI verses non-PVI ablation for AF. The nearest thing we have to sham controls. Unanswered questions remain but PVI cert…
RT @DrJHoward: Does PVI work? There haven’t been any blinded RCTs versus sham, but we can analyse trials where both arms received ablation…
RT @DrAhranArnold: The necessity of a sham controlled RCT of PVI for AF remains contested but in the meantime we have this meta-analysis fr…
PVI verses non-PVI ablation for AF. The nearest thing we have to sham controls. Unanswered questions remain but PVI certainly very effective at reducing AF burden! @ProfDFrancis @drjohnm
RT @DrJHoward: Does PVI work? There haven’t been any blinded RCTs versus sham, but we can analyse trials where both arms received ablation…
The necessity of a sham controlled RCT of PVI for AF remains contested but in the meantime we have this meta-analysis from @ImperialEP RCTs of PVI vs non-PVI ablation show benefit for PVI
RT @DrJHoward: Does PVI work? There haven’t been any blinded RCTs versus sham, but we can analyse trials where both arms received ablation…
RT @DrJHoward: Does PVI work? There haven’t been any blinded RCTs versus sham, but we can analyse trials where both arms received ablation…
Does PVI work? There haven’t been any blinded RCTs versus sham, but we can analyse trials where both arms received ablation but only one arm got PVI. In a meta-analysis oh these 6 trials, the PVI arms do much better https://t.co/HoXSQICkcR @DrAfzalSohaib h