↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Presumed Sudden Cardiac Deaths Among Persons With HIV and Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
Title
Presumed Sudden Cardiac Deaths Among Persons With HIV and Heart Failure
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, September 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.06.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zian H. Tseng

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2019.
All research outputs
#393,880
of 13,603,280 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#111
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,696
of 220,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,603,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.