↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Gaps in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 861)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
223 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Gaps in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.05.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Canepa, Frits M.E. Franssen, Horst Olschewski, Mitja Lainscak, Michael Böhm, Luigi Tavazzi, Stephan Rosenkranz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 223 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#116,774
of 13,699,002 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#20
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,902
of 242,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,699,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.