RT @LuisCLCorreia: A recent editorial in JACC Heart Failure entitled "A call for a change: level of statistical significance" presents a ty…
@FZores @AtulPathak31 @SABOURETCardio @Khanoyan_cardio 6⃣lutter sur plusieurs fronts: JACC HF: https://t.co/XeEvnyhU9u NY Times: https://t.co/pyO2KdQoxd
'Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.' Wide confidence intervals mean a need for more data, they don't mean "no difference".
RT @jvrbntz: “Surely, God loves the .06 nearly as much as the .05.”—Cohen, J. Things I have learned (so far). American psychologist., 45(…
RT @LuisCLCorreia: A recent editorial in JACC Heart Failure entitled "A call for a change: level of statistical significance" presents a ty…
I wake up with this absurd. One more evidence that implementation of open science barriers on the conservatives. Let’s give a shit for underpowered studies, let’s give a shit for false positive results and the story goes on and on. @LuisCLCorreia
RT @LuisCLCorreia: A recent editorial in JACC Heart Failure entitled "A call for a change: level of statistical significance" presents a ty…
RT @DrRajivsankar: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance #HeartFailure Excellent article on the importance on focusing on ef…
A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance #HeartFailure Excellent article on the importance on focusing on effect size,odds ratios, hazard ratios,rate ratios, confidence intervals- use clinical judgment over p values https://t.co/iVU9HpOc2L
RT @LuisCLCorreia: A recent editorial in JACC Heart Failure entitled "A call for a change: level of statistical significance" presents a ty…
A recent editorial in JACC Heart Failure entitled "A call for a change: level of statistical significance" presents a type II error aversion, disregarding the problem of type I error. https://t.co/I5HUHorEAJ @VPrasadMDMPH @drjohnm @jvrbntz @helal_lucas
RT @radiokeller: good idea for an editorial. I credit #epitwitter for my increasing indifference to p-values and do think a new paradigm is…
RT @radiokeller: good idea for an editorial. I credit #epitwitter for my increasing indifference to p-values and do think a new paradigm is…
Well worth a read (if you have 2 min to spare a friday evening).
good idea for an editorial. I credit #epitwitter for my increasing indifference to p-values and do think a new paradigm is sorely needed https://t.co/1KrawkZaR8
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @vamrhein: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance https://t.co/SgnWneAuBT
“Surely, God loves the .06 nearly as much as the .05.”—Cohen, J. Things I have learned (so far). American psychologist., 45(12), 1304., (1990).
A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance https://t.co/6wEJg2W3QH
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
“In randomized controlled trials, should we focus on the odds ratios, hazard ratios, rate ratios, and the confidence intervals, and use clinical judgment over p values?”
RT @pash22: In randomized controlled trials, should we focus on the odds ratios, hazard ratios, rate ratios, and the confidence intervals,…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @drjohnm: Great editorial. It made me re-listen to @f2harrell @VPrasadMDMPH podcast Bayes' approach https://t.co/YQ1BLqjXev a) what is t…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @vamrhein: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance https://t.co/SgnWneAuBT
RT @vamrhein: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance https://t.co/SgnWneAuBT
RT @vamrhein: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance https://t.co/SgnWneAuBT
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @vamrhein: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance https://t.co/SgnWneAuBT
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @drjohnm: Great editorial. It made me re-listen to @f2harrell @VPrasadMDMPH podcast Bayes' approach https://t.co/YQ1BLqjXev a) what is t…
RT @drjohnm: Great editorial. It made me re-listen to @f2harrell @VPrasadMDMPH podcast Bayes' approach https://t.co/YQ1BLqjXev a) what is t…
RT @drjohnm: Great editorial. It made me re-listen to @f2harrell @VPrasadMDMPH podcast Bayes' approach https://t.co/YQ1BLqjXev a) what is t…
A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance https://t.co/SgnWneAuBT
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
In randomized controlled trials, should we focus on the odds ratios, hazard ratios, rate ratios, and the confidence intervals, and use clinical judgment over p values? https://t.co/LmtnWkvfyU via @coconnormd
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
What if we changed our societal view of what statistical significance means? Many clinicians believe that the p value provides a simple, reliable, objective triage tool. Our patients deserve another look of how we interpret clinical research. https://t.co/
RT @drjohnm: Great editorial. It made me re-listen to @f2harrell @VPrasadMDMPH podcast Bayes' approach https://t.co/YQ1BLqjXev a) what is t…
RT @drjohnm: Great editorial. It made me re-listen to @f2harrell @VPrasadMDMPH podcast Bayes' approach https://t.co/YQ1BLqjXev a) what is t…
RT @drjohnm: Great editorial. It made me re-listen to @f2harrell @VPrasadMDMPH podcast Bayes' approach https://t.co/YQ1BLqjXev a) what is t…
Interesting editorial that shows the problem in the interpretation of the studies when the results are dichotomized (true / false): A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure https://t.co/qmJLZssZbb
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @drjohnm: Great editorial. It made me re-listen to @f2harrell @VPrasadMDMPH podcast Bayes' approach https://t.co/YQ1BLqjXev a) what is t…
Great editorial. It made me re-listen to @f2harrell @VPrasadMDMPH podcast Bayes' approach https://t.co/YQ1BLqjXev a) what is the benefit deemed significant? b) what is the probability of this sig benefit given the data? Those would help me a lot at the be
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
RT @coconnormd: A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https:…
A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance | JACC: Heart Failure: Can we move away from p values and 0.05? https://t.co/7HVLtZfXPA
Interpretation of clinical results and decision making should be guided by direction and magnitude of effects along with clinical decision threshold criteria; not p-values. A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance https://t.co/GLWMGT1PeP
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
RT @yulnunezvill: Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical S…
@FormigaFrancesc
@SVCardio @IcUnidad @ValleAlfonso @afcisnal @mi_cardiologo @Dr_Manito
Interpretation of results of the clinical trial. The perversion of the p-value A Call for Change: Level of Statistical Significance https://t.co/zlkLousHU1