| Title |
2019 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With High Blood Pressure A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald E. Casey, Randal J. Thomas, Vivek Bhalla, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, Paul A. Heidenreich, Dhaval Kolte, Paul Muntner, Sidney C. Smith, John A. Spertus, John R. Windle, Gregory D. Wozniak, Boback Ziaeian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 50% |
| Colombia | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,734,089
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#3,885
of 16,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,869
of 380,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#93
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.