Title |
Anatomical and Procedural Factors of Severe Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Ablation
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.08.003 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kenichi Tokutake, Michifumi Tokuda, Seigo Yamashita, Hidenori Sato, Hirotsugu Ikewaki, Eri Okajima, Hirotsuna Oseto, Masaaki Yokoyama, Ryota Isogai, Kenichi Yokoyama, Mika Kato, Ryohsuke Narui, Shinichi Tanigawa, Seiichiro Matsuo, Satoru Miyanaga, Kenichi Sugimoto, Michihiro Yoshimura, Teiichi Yamane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 12% |
Japan | 3 | 7% |
Australia | 3 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
Egypt | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 22 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 35% |
Researcher | 3 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,591,699
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#360
of 1,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,363
of 377,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.