↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Focal Ventricular Tachycardias in Structural Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 tweeters
Title
Focal Ventricular Tachycardias in Structural Heart Disease
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.09.013
Authors

Robert D. Anderson, Geoffrey Lee, Ivana Trivic, Timothy Campbell, Timmy Pham, Chrishan Nalliah, Eddy Kizana, Stuart P. Thomas, Siddharth J. Trivedi, Troy Watts, Jonathan Kalman, Saurabh Kumar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#490,004
of 14,173,817 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#56
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,774
of 305,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,173,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.