| Title |
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Past, Present, and Future Perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.09.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gustavo S. Guandalini, Jackson J. Liang, Francis E. Marchlinski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 16% |
| Argentina | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 5 | 4% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Turkey | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 90 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 12% |
| Scientists | 14 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 158 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 57 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 36% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 74 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#316,457
of 25,918,061 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#29
of 1,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,463
of 480,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.