↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Marijuana Use in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
153 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
Title
Marijuana Use in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), January 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ersilia M. DeFilippis, Navkaranbir S. Bajaj, Amitoj Singh, Rhynn Malloy, Michael M. Givertz, Ron Blankstein, Deepak L. Bhatt, Muthiah Vaduganathan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 153 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 300. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#43,854
of 14,368,729 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#128
of 12,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,005
of 193,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#2
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,368,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.