| Title |
Extracellular Myocardial Volume in Patients With Aortic Stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Russell J. Everett, Thomas A. Treibel, Miho Fukui, Heesun Lee, Marzia Rigolli, Anvesha Singh, Petra Bijsterveld, Lionel Tastet, Tarique Al Musa, Laura Dobson, Calvin Chin, Gabriella Captur, Sang Yong, Stephanie Wiesemann, Vanessa M. Ferreira, Stefan K. Piechnik, Jeanette Schulz-Menger, Erik B. Schelbert, Marie-Annick Clavel, David E. Newby, Saul G. Myerson, Phillipe Pibarot, Sahmin Lee, João L. Cavalcante, Seung-Pyo Lee, Gerry P. McCann, John P. Greenwood, James C. Moon, Marc R. Dweck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 14% |
| Spain | 6 | 4% |
| Italy | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Russia | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 85 | 58% |
| Scientists | 28 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 48% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 62 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#460,929
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,122
of 16,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,205
of 479,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#21
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.