↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Real World Use of Hypertonic Saline in Refractory Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 916)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
209 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Real World Use of Hypertonic Saline in Refractory Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.10.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Griffin, Aaron Soufer, Erden Goljo, Matthew Colna, Veena S. Rao, Sangchoon Jeon, Parinita Raghavendra, Julie D’Ambrosi, Ralph Riello, Steven G. Coca, Devin Mahoney, Daniel Jacoby, Tariq Ahmad, Michael Chen, W.H. Wilson Tang, Jeffrey Turner, Wilfried Mullens, Francis P. Wilson, Jeffrey M. Testani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 209 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#114,345
of 14,368,603 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#18
of 916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,505
of 175,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,368,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.