| Title |
Coronary Artery Target Selection and Survival After Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Faisal G. Bakaeen, Kirthi Ravichandren, Eugene H. Blackstone, Penny L. Houghtaling, Edward G. Soltesz, Douglas R. Johnston, Stephanie L. Mick, José L. Navia, Michael Zhen-Yu Tong, Kenneth R. McCurry, Rami Akhrass, Mouin Abdallah, Gösta B. Pettersson, Nicholas M. Smedira, Eric E. Roselli, A. Marc Gillinov, Lars G. Svensson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 26% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| Colombia | 3 | 4% |
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 29% |
| Scientists | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 39% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#949,899
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,349
of 16,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,027
of 479,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#45
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.