| Title |
2020 Focused Update of the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Management of Mitral Regurgitation A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert O. Bonow, Patrick T. O’Gara, David H. Adams, Vinay Badhwar, Joseph E. Bavaria, Sammy Elmariah, Judy W. Hung, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Alanna A. Morris, Ruby Satpathy, Brian Whisenant, Y. Joseph Woo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 421 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 13% |
| Spain | 50 | 12% |
| Argentina | 16 | 4% |
| Colombia | 15 | 4% |
| Mexico | 15 | 4% |
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| Peru | 9 | 2% |
| Brazil | 9 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 81 | 19% |
| Unknown | 152 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 286 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 70 | 17% |
| Scientists | 43 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 170 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 21% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 52 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 54% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 58 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 274. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#131,965
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#300
of 16,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,727
of 483,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#11
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.