↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

2020 Focused Update of the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Management of Mitral Regurgitation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
380 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
Title
2020 Focused Update of the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Management of Mitral Regurgitation
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), May 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert O. Bonow, Patrick T. O’Gara, David H. Adams, Vinay Badhwar, Joseph E. Bavaria, Sammy Elmariah, Judy W. Hung, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Alanna A. Morris, Ruby Satpathy, Brian Whisenant, Y. Joseph Woo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 380 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 257. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#61,707
of 15,377,673 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#163
of 12,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,301
of 286,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#5
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,377,673 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.