↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: Three-year Outcomes from the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 2,251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
twitter
9 tweeters
Title
Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: Three-year Outcomes from the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial
Published in
JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.019
Authors

David E. Kandzari, Jacques J. Koolen, Gheorghe Doros, Hector M. Garcia-Garcia, Johan Bennett, Ariel Roguin, Elie G. Gharib, Donald E. Cutlip, Ron Waksman, for the BIOFLOW V Investigators

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#193,480
of 15,124,181 outputs
Outputs from JACC Cardiovascular Interventions
#21
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,882
of 247,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC Cardiovascular Interventions
#1
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,124,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.