↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 4,033)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial
Published in
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

David E. Kandzari, Jacques J. Koolen, Gheorghe Doros, Hector M. Garcia-Garcia, Johan Bennett, Ariel Roguin, Elie G. Gharib, Donald E. Cutlip, Ron Waksman, BIOFLOW V Investigators

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 31 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Materials Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 33 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 343. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#95,551
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#7
of 4,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,618
of 433,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#2
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.