↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Diuretic Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
296 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Diuretic Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), March 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.059
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Michael Felker, David H. Ellison, Wilfried Mullens, Zachary L. Cox, Jeffrey M. Testani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 296 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#94,969
of 15,363,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#254
of 12,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,907
of 255,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#7
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,363,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.