| Title |
Diuretic Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure JACC State-of-the-Art Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.059 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Michael Felker, David H. Ellison, Wilfried Mullens, Zachary L. Cox, Jeffrey M. Testani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 929 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 93 | 10% |
| United States | 78 | 8% |
| Spain | 57 | 6% |
| Colombia | 35 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 20 | 2% |
| India | 20 | 2% |
| Peru | 16 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 15 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 1% |
| Other | 151 | 16% |
| Unknown | 432 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 737 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 107 | 12% |
| Scientists | 64 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 19 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 458 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 10% |
| Other | 43 | 9% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 38 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 8% |
| Other | 68 | 15% |
| Unknown | 185 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 186 | 41% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 6% |
| Unknown | 202 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 570. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#42,181
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#101
of 16,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,373
of 384,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#5
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.