RT @EGarciaSayan: @RezaEmaminia @PPibarot @OKhaliqueMD @hahn_rt @LilyLeiZhang1 Also, the definition of “normal” SVi may need to take into a…
RT @EGarciaSayan: @RezaEmaminia @PPibarot @OKhaliqueMD @hahn_rt @LilyLeiZhang1 Also, the definition of “normal” SVi may need to take into a…
@RezaEmaminia @PPibarot @OKhaliqueMD @hahn_rt @LilyLeiZhang1 Also, the definition of “normal” SVi may need to take into account other factors. In a male patient 35 ml/m2 may not be the best cutoff. Should we be using 40 instead? https://t.co/VSkbDwXieU
RT @iamritu: 9/Flow rate =SV ➗LVET For given SV, the longer LVET, the lower FR & shorter the LVET,the higher FR.sex-specific thresholds of…
RT @iamritu: 9/Flow rate =SV ➗LVET For given SV, the longer LVET, the lower FR & shorter the LVET,the higher FR.sex-specific thresholds of…
RT @iamritu: 9/Flow rate =SV ➗LVET For given SV, the longer LVET, the lower FR & shorter the LVET,the higher FR.sex-specific thresholds of…
RT @iamritu: 9/Flow rate =SV ➗LVET For given SV, the longer LVET, the lower FR & shorter the LVET,the higher FR.sex-specific thresholds of…
RT @iamritu: 9/Flow rate =SV ➗LVET For given SV, the longer LVET, the lower FR & shorter the LVET,the higher FR.sex-specific thresholds of…
9/Flow rate =SV ➗LVET For given SV, the longer LVET, the lower FR & shorter the LVET,the higher FR.sex-specific thresholds of low FR <40 ml/m2 for🙋♂️&<32 ml/m2 for 🙋🏻♀️ outperform guidelines’ threshold of 35 ml/m2 in risk stratification af
RT @E_Guzzetti: @iamritu @WomenAs1 @atunuguntla1 @MayraGuerreroMD @hvanspall @DrMarthaGulati @pattypellikka Lots of work on this regard bei…
RT @E_Guzzetti: @iamritu @WomenAs1 @atunuguntla1 @MayraGuerreroMD @hvanspall @DrMarthaGulati @pattypellikka Lots of work on this regard bei…
@iamritu @WomenAs1 @atunuguntla1 @MayraGuerreroMD @hvanspall @DrMarthaGulati @pattypellikka Lots of work on this regard being done with @ClavelLabo @IUCPQ, but agree there is much to be done yet... https://t.co/XvWkMHuk8O https://t.co/d8j5okiwha https:/
New low flow sex specific cutoffs #ASEchoJC optimal cut-points for low-flow were: <32 ml/m2 for women <40 ml/m2 for men
@robertomlang @iamritu @FedericoAsch @PPibarot @MarcDweck @hpatel824 @rajdoc2005 @Hragy @DrHaniMahmoud @hatemsoliman @ShelbyKuttyMD @ash71us @GWhalleyPhD @edwardagill @NadeenFaza @JGrapsa Excellent point. Sex differences should also be accounted (women hav
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @SABOURETCardio: One of the (rare) meaningful publications about sex-related differences. Many publications in other field write about s…
One of the (rare) meaningful publications about sex-related differences. Many publications in other field write about sex differences and forget the confounding factors (weight, age, renal function, global frailty).#cardiotwitter
RT @adnanalkhouli: An interesting analysis by @PPibarot & colleagues on the optimal cutoff of SV index in LFAS. The commonly used 35ml/m2 d…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
@renujain19 @BijoyKhandheria Do you suspect these different values would take hold in practice?
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
RT @JACCJournals: Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS inter…
Sex-specific thresholds (32 ml/m2 for ♀️ , and 40 ml/m2 for ♂️ ), may provide better risk stratification for #vhdAS intervention compared to guideline threshold of 35 ml/m2. https://t.co/h2hQUGmEkb #JACC #vhdAS #SAVR @IUCPQ @PPibarot https://t.co/oz5N7YzEL
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @JACCJournals: Patients with paradoxical low-flow high-gradient #vhdAS fare worse than those with low-gradient vhdAS, and it may be wort…
RT @JACCJournals: Patients with paradoxical low-flow high-gradient #vhdAS fare worse than those with low-gradient vhdAS, and it may be wort…
RT @JACCJournals: Patients with paradoxical low-flow high-gradient #vhdAS fare worse than those with low-gradient vhdAS, and it may be wort…
RT @JACCJournals: Patients with paradoxical low-flow high-gradient #vhdAS fare worse than those with low-gradient vhdAS, and it may be wort…
RT @JACCJournals: Patients with paradoxical low-flow high-gradient #vhdAS fare worse than those with low-gradient vhdAS, and it may be wort…
RT @JACCJournals: Patients with paradoxical low-flow high-gradient #vhdAS fare worse than those with low-gradient vhdAS, and it may be wort…
.Interesante. Propone un cambio al flujo propuesto por las guias para el RVAo y lo ajusta al sexo.
Patients with paradoxical low-flow high-gradient #vhdAS fare worse than those with low-gradient vhdAS, and it may be worth intervening sooner and changing the threshold for low-flow based on sex. https://t.co/h2hQUGmEkb @IUCPQ @PPibarot #JACC https://t.co/
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @adnanalkhouli: An interesting analysis by @PPibarot & colleagues on the optimal cutoff of SV index in LFAS. The commonly used 35ml/m2 d…
RT @OKhaliqueMD: Very interesting @PPibarot I always wondered about this! @purviparwani @onco_cardiology @tiffchenMD @DrRyanPDaly @AChoiHea…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @adnanalkhouli: An interesting analysis by @PPibarot & colleagues on the optimal cutoff of SV index in LFAS. The commonly used 35ml/m2 d…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @adnanalkhouli: An interesting analysis by @PPibarot & colleagues on the optimal cutoff of SV index in LFAS. The commonly used 35ml/m2 d…
RT @adnanalkhouli: An interesting analysis by @PPibarot & colleagues on the optimal cutoff of SV index in LFAS. The commonly used 35ml/m2 d…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @E_Guzzetti: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low fl…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @OKhaliqueMD: Very interesting @PPibarot I always wondered about this! @purviparwani @onco_cardiology @tiffchenMD @DrRyanPDaly @AChoiHea…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
Very interesting @PPibarot I always wondered about this! @purviparwani @onco_cardiology @tiffchenMD @DrRyanPDaly @AChoiHeart
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @adnanalkhouli: An interesting analysis by @PPibarot & colleagues on the optimal cutoff of SV index in LFAS. The commonly used 35ml/m2 d…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @E_Guzzetti: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low fl…
RT @adnanalkhouli: An interesting analysis by @PPibarot & colleagues on the optimal cutoff of SV index in LFAS. The commonly used 35ml/m2 d…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @adnanalkhouli: An interesting analysis by @PPibarot & colleagues on the optimal cutoff of SV index in LFAS. The commonly used 35ml/m2 d…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
An interesting analysis by @PPibarot & colleagues on the optimal cutoff of SV index in LFAS. The commonly used 35ml/m2 didn’t correlate w outcomes while a sex-specific threshold (40 in men & 32 in women) did. @SorinVPislaru @JaeKOh2 @MDMankad @RMan
RT @E_Guzzetti: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low fl…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…
RT @PPibarot: Recent paper that we published in JACC on sex-related differences in cut-off values of stroke volume index to define low flow…