↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Renal Denervation in High-Risk Patients With Hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
47 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Renal Denervation in High-Risk Patients With Hypertension
Published in
JACC, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felix Mahfoud, Giuseppe Mancia, Roland Schmieder, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Luis Ruilope, Markus Schlaich, Robert Whitbourn, Andreas Zirlik, Thomas Zeller, Philipp Stawowy, Sidney A. Cohen, Martin Fahy, Michael Böhm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 16%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 32 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 35%
Engineering 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 38 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2022.
All research outputs
#244,383
of 25,400,630 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#557
of 16,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,294
of 433,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#16
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,400,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.