| Title |
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.067 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pavel Osmancik, Dalibor Herman, Petr Neuzil, Pavel Hala, Milos Taborsky, Petr Kala, Martin Poloczek, Josef Stasek, Ludek Haman, Marian Branny, Jan Chovancik, Pavel Cervinka, Jiri Holy, Tomas Kovarnik, David Zemanek, Stepan Havranek, Vlastimil Vancura, Jan Opatrny, Petr Peichl, Petr Tousek, Veronika Lekesova, Jiri Jarkovsky, Martina Novackova, Klara Benesova, Petr Widimsky, Vivek Y. Reddy, PRAGUE-17 Trial Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 211 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 18% |
| Spain | 10 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 4% |
| Mexico | 9 | 4% |
| Colombia | 8 | 4% |
| Germany | 8 | 4% |
| Japan | 8 | 4% |
| Argentina | 6 | 3% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 76 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 143 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 17% |
| Scientists | 23 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 304 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 13% |
| Other | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 18% |
| Unknown | 122 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 40% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 134 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#279,539
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#628
of 16,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,359
of 433,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#18
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.