↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Optimal Fluoroscopic Projections of Coronary Ostia and Bifurcations Defined by Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography

Overview of attention for article published in JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 2,364)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
176 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Optimal Fluoroscopic Projections of Coronary Ostia and Bifurcations Defined by Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
Published in
JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, July 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.042
Authors

Viktor Kočka, Pascal Theriault-Lauzier, Tian-Yuan Xiong, Jeremy Ben-Shoshan, Róbert Petr, Marek Laboš, Jean Buithieu, Negareh Mousavi, Thomas Pilgrim, Fabien Praz, Pavel Overtchouk, Jean-Pierre Beaudry, Marco Spaziano, Jean-Philippe Pelletier, Giuseppe Martucci, Sonny Dandona, Stéphane Rinfret, Stephan Windecker, Jonathon Leipsic, Nicolo Piazza

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 176 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#161,668
of 15,573,389 outputs
Outputs from JACC Cardiovascular Interventions
#16
of 2,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,014
of 253,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC Cardiovascular Interventions
#2
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,573,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.