| Title |
Optimal Fluoroscopic Projections of Coronary Ostia and Bifurcations Defined by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Viktor Kočka, Pascal Thériault-Lauzier, Tian-Yuan Xiong, Jeremy Ben-Shoshan, Róbert Petr, Marek Laboš, Jean Buithieu, Negareh Mousavi, Thomas Pilgrim, Fabien Praz, Pavel Overtchouk, Jean-Pierre Beaudry, Marco Spaziano, Jean-Philippe Pelletier, Giuseppe Martucci, Sonny Dandona, Stéphane Rinfret, Stephan Windecker, Jonathon Leipsic, Nicolo Piazza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 178 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 21% |
| Mexico | 11 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 67 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 126 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 16% |
| Scientists | 16 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 40% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#357,935
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#38
of 4,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,138
of 431,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#3
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.