↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Discrepancies in Measurement of the Thoracic Aorta

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
223 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
Title
Discrepancies in Measurement of the Thoracic Aorta
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), July 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.084
Authors

John A. Elefteriades, Sandip K. Mukherjee, Hamid Mojibian

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 223 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#131,827
of 15,632,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#343
of 12,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,969
of 252,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#14
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,632,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.