| Title |
Prognostic Impact of Race in Patients Undergoing PCI Analysis From 10 Randomized Coronary Stent Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mordechai Golomb, Björn Redfors, Aaron Crowley, Pieter C. Smits, Patrick W. Serruys, Clemens von Birgelen, Mahesh V. Madhavan, Ori Ben-Yehuda, Roxana Mehran, Martin B. Leon, Gregg W. Stone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 48% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#502,012
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#87
of 4,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,748
of 432,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#6
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.