| Title |
Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Varunsiri Atti, Yeongjin Gwon, Mahesh Anantha Narayanan, Santiago Garcia, Yader Sandoval, Emmanouil S. Brilakis, Mir B. Basir, Mohit K. Turagam, Akshay Khandelwal, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Mamas A. Mamas, J. Dawn Abbott, Deepak L. Bhatt, Poonam Velagapudi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 31% |
| Saudi Arabia | 7 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| Argentina | 5 | 4% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 62% |
| Scientists | 21 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#498,112
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#86
of 4,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,629
of 432,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#5
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.