↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 2,363)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
128 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Published in
JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, July 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Varunsiri Atti, Yeongjin Gwon, Mahesh Anantha Narayanan, Santiago Garcia, Yader Sandoval, Emmanouil S. Brilakis, Mir B. Basir, Mohit K. Turagam, Akshay Khandelwal, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Mamas A. Mamas, J. Dawn Abbott, Deepak L. Bhatt, Poonam Velagapudi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#243,227
of 15,569,128 outputs
Outputs from JACC Cardiovascular Interventions
#30
of 2,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,491
of 233,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC Cardiovascular Interventions
#3
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,569,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.