| Title |
First-In-Human Use of a Mixed Reality Display During Cardiac Ablation Procedures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer N Avari Silva, Michael K Southworth, Walter M Blume, Christopher Andrews, George F Van Hare, Aarti S Dalal, Nathan Miller, Sandeep S Sodhi, Jonathan R Silva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 42% |
| Turkey | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 70% |
| Scientists | 12 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#231,661
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#20
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,537
of 429,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.