↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Bleeding in Patients on Oral Anticoagulants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
308 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader
Title
2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Bleeding in Patients on Oral Anticoagulants
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), August 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gordon F. Tomaselli, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Adam Cuker, Paul P. Dobesh, John U. Doherty, John W. Eikelboom, Roberta Florido, Ty J. Gluckman, William J. Hucker, Roxana Mehran, Steven R. Messé, Alexander C. Perino, Fatima Rodriguez, Ravindra Sarode, Deborah M. Siegal, Barbara S. Wiggins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 308 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 233. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#72,584
of 15,634,343 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#183
of 12,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,860
of 242,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#7
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,634,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.