| Title |
Long-Term Outcomes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in the SCD-HeFT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.061 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeanne E. Poole, Brian Olshansky, Daniel B. Mark, Jill Anderson, George Johnson, Anne S. Hellkamp, Linda Davidson-Ray, Daniel P. Fishbein, Robin E. Boineau, Kevin J. Anstrom, Per G. Reinhall, Douglas L. Packer, Kerry L. Lee, Gust H. Bardy, SCD-HeFT Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 16% |
| Spain | 9 | 9% |
| Colombia | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Argentina | 4 | 4% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 19% |
| Scientists | 11 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#591,162
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,502
of 16,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,005
of 434,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#45
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.