↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
389 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), August 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander C. Fanaroff, Robert M. Califf, Robert A. Harrington, Christopher B. Granger, John J.V. McMurray, Manesh R. Patel, Deepak L. Bhatt, Stephan Windecker, Adrian F. Hernandez, C. Michael Gibson, John H. Alexander, Renato D. Lopes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 389 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 301. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#51,608
of 15,634,203 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#137
of 12,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,514
of 187,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#2
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,634,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.