@jludwig86 @ShmiraSoft80610 @PhDemetri And here a review of 50 years of OS errors and "common sense". https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC Review Topic of the Week - ScienceDirect https://t.co/mGmLpRqx02
RT @jsenior64: La diferencia entre sentido común y la evidencia en ensayos clínicos. Lo que pensamos como buenas alternativas terapéuticas,…
La diferencia entre sentido común y la evidencia en ensayos clínicos. Lo que pensamos como buenas alternativas terapéuticas, pero que aumentaron desenlaces en ensayos clínicos. https://t.co/7kuOyHtqqA https://t.co/NsDQjlI6Qn
@nshejazi @ildiazm @jared_huling @UnibusPluram @lorenzoF_SM What is easy to quantify (and has been done many times in reviews) is that today this pathological evidence is too useful. See: https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@beenwrekt Agree, but "common sense" is a bad option for causality too. Read this revision from the Journal of the American College of Cardiology: "...Results from RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observ
RT @SeparCPulmonar: 👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data…
RT @SeparCPulmonar: 👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data…
RT @SeparCPulmonar: 👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data…
RT @SeparCPulmonar: 👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data…
RT @SeparCPulmonar: 👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data…
RT @SeparCPulmonar: 👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data…
RT @SeparCPulmonar: 👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data…
RT @SeparCPulmonar: 👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data…
RT @SeparCPulmonar: 👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data…
RT @SeparCPulmonar: 👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data…
👩⚕️👨🏻⚕️Toma de decisiones individualizadas ¿RCTs vs. Sentido común y observación de datos de vida real? ¿el big data y la AI vienen a sustituir a los grandes RCTs? Les recomendamos esta lectura: link al paper completo de descarga gratuita 👇👇👇 https://t
@KennethBodin Jag känner mig bekräftat angående min åsikt om fysiker och folkhälsan under en pandemi https://t.co/4oximGq340
RT @ABsteward: 🔥Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense & clinical observation 🔥Common sense a…
RT @ABsteward: 🔥Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense & clinical observation 🔥Common sense a…
RT @ABsteward: 🔥Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense & clinical observation 🔥Common sense a…
RT @ABsteward: 🔥Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense & clinical observation 🔥Common sense a…
RT @DrAmbuj: Evidence versus expertise, logic, reasoning etc. Appreciate RCTs (well done) despite whatever. Evidence rocks. https://t.co/8r…
RT @ABsteward: 🔥Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense & clinical observation 🔥Common sense a…
RT @ABsteward: 🔥Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense & clinical observation 🔥Common sense a…
🔥Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense & clinical observation 🔥Common sense and clinical observation fail because of the inability to fully understand complex biopsychosocial systems H/t @pash22 #IDTwitter
From @jaccjournals https://t.co/SmKANTzcRP (Free for download) https://t.co/1qvov8tdPi
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
@stephensenn @elmir1omerovic @yudapearl @PatientStormDoc @f2harrell @dylanarmbruste3 @drjohnm @kaulcsmc @GreggWStone I recommend this interesting paper from the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) with a review study about the "observation
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @DrAmbuj: Evidence versus expertise, logic, reasoning etc. Appreciate RCTs (well done) despite whatever. Evidence rocks. https://t.co/8r…
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
RT @XaviBarberUMH: @DeMadaria the central illustration could incorporate in your “talks” in order to show how randomizes trials have more s…
@DeMadaria the central illustration could incorporate in your “talks” in order to show how randomizes trials have more sense versus common sense. What do you think?
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
@TorstenAkesson Det var precis därför väldig bra att ingen fysiker eller ingenjör varit ansvarig för pandemi-hanteringen. Saker som sjukdomar och beteende i biologisk variabla system (också kallad människan) är något helt annat än matematisk deduktion. Lä
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
RT @pash22: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGle…
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/2XGlesywyc
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
RT @DrAmbuj: Evidence versus expertise, logic, reasoning etc. Appreciate RCTs (well done) despite whatever. Evidence rocks. https://t.co/8r…
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
Evidence versus expertise, logic, reasoning etc. Appreciate RCTs (well done) despite whatever. Evidence rocks. https://t.co/8rus6yBLcc
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
“Common sense and clinical observation fail because of the inability to fully understand complex biopsychosocial systems.”
RT @neumanmd: Common sense is irreplaceable in medical practice. Yet appeals to common sense have also been invoked at one point or another…
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @neumanmd: Common sense is irreplaceable in medical practice. Yet appeals to common sense have also been invoked at one point or another…
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
RT @neumanmd: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
Common sense is irreplaceable in medical practice. Yet appeals to common sense have also been invoked at one point or another to rationalize every now-debunked therapy, ranging from the simply ineffective to the outright dangerous. Beware the appeal to “co
RT @MaryDixonWoods: Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sen…
Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC R... https://t.co/Xsa7ukjefn
Some good examples here from cardiology of how the findings of RCTs may contradict observational studies or "common sense," with acknowledgement of the need to evolve the clinical trials ecosystem. https://t.co/22GgFrrFta
@drjohnm I recommend to you this paper!: https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@hemanth_kanak @elmir1omerovic @drjohnm @kaulcsmc @GreggWStone @f2harrell @yudapearl In fact is more, about 85% im cardiology in this revision. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
1/ That is "selective citation of evidence"...😀 Additionally, in that paper, IABP was used as an example for the discrepancy between OS and RCT. Only one paper from NEJM was cited (an OS from 1973). I suggest some alternative papers. N Engl J Med 2000;342:
@elmir1omerovic @AdanZBecerra1 @f2harrell @dredgardorsey @ildiazm @ArgoloF @drjohnm @kaulcsmc @GreggWStone @yudapearl I can give you many examples... Here some of them: https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@clementy_ep Paper from JACC https://t.co/AW8Wk09Q46
@robertwplatt @EpiEllie @PWGTennant I recommend you this paper from JACC: https://t.co/mQgIFeoaHU
@barttels2 @GidMK Is common sense all that common? https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/UVdB9SR44g
@anish_koka @drjohnm https://t.co/AW8WjZRGPY Here you have an (very incomplete) list in cardiology from the last 50 years.
@GGCCdoc @matthieugarby @DustBin00 @Nicolas_Jacob_ @Scintigraphiste Va falloir un peu muscler le jeu de ton épistémologie, on parle études longitudinales de terrain, pas uniquement mécanismes physiologiques. Tu veux que je te rappelle en quoi on peut pas e