| Title |
Loop Diuretic Prescription and 30-Day Outcomes in Older Patients With Heart Failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Faselis, Cherinne Arundel, Samir Patel, Phillip H. Lam, Stephen S. Gottlieb, Michael R. Zile, Prakash Deedwania, Gerasimos Filippatos, Helen M. Sheriff, Qing Zeng, Charity J. Morgan, Samuel Wopperer, Tran Nguyen, Richard M. Allman, Gregg C. Fonarow, Ali Ahmed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 21% |
| Japan | 7 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Mexico | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 46 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 62% |
| Scientists | 22 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#474,664
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,171
of 16,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,555
of 428,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#42
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.